Plaintiff v. Defendant Divorce Attorney

  • 10/18/2018
    Client: Defendant Divorce Attorney
    Outcome: Verdict for the Defense

Synopsis:

DBMS successfully defended a divorce lawyer accused of malpractice for not enjoining an Egyptian ex-husband’s retirement savings accounts thereby allowing him to transfer them internationally to avoid paying his ex-wife.

Plaintiff’s standard of care expert testified that the divorce lawyer failed to bring a third-party action against three banks and Fidelity, where the retirement savings were located, seeking an injunction, despite the client’s repeated written warnings that her ex-husband would transfer money internationally. Had the accounts themselves been enjoined, the transfers before trial would have been prevented.

Defendants’ expert testified that suing banks and Fidelity was not required by the standard of care. 

The plaintiff asked for $1.4 million.  After two hours of deliberations, the jury returned a not guilty verdict. 

×

DBMS attorneys continue to work remotely in compliance with the Governor's ongoing shelter in place order and to ensure the safety of our clients, employees and colleagues. In addition to focusing on the work entrusted to us by our clients before the Covid-19 pandemic, we are assisting our clients in protecting medical caregivers from being compelled to turn away from their patients to participate in litigation activities that can wait until the virus is under control.

We salute the medical providers who are valiantly risking their personal safety for the benefit of all of us. Thank you. You are heroes.