DBMS defends the
Medical Profession
Defending Specialists
Verdict for the Defense

DBMS successfully defended a Lasik surgeon accused of failing to properly assess a patient prior to surgery.

Plaintiff v. Defendant OphthalmologistRead More
  • J. Kent Mathewson
  • Ashley E. Dus
Defending Specialists
Defendant Dismissed From Case

DBMS successfully secured a dismissal on behalf of a rheumatologist involved in a case in which a woman accused multiple doctors of failing to timely diagnose her with AIDS.

Plaintiff v. Defendant RheumatologistRead More
  • Anthony M. Pinto
  • Amanda L. Balen
  • Dominique  Ritvo
Defending Hospitals
Verdict for the Defense

DBMS successfully defended a hospital and an intensivist accused of failing to timely diagnose a retroperitoneal bleed following a complex procedure.

Plaintiff v. Defendant Hospital and IntensivistRead More
  • Stetson F. Atwood
  • Erin  Calandriello
  • Ashley E. Dus
DBMS defends the
Long-Term Care Industry
Supportive Living Facilities
Defending institutions

DBMS successfully represents nursing homes, rehabilitation centers and long-term care facilities in a variety of claims.

Supportive Living Facilities
  • James D. Sloan
  • Meagan P. VanderWeele
Healthcare Practitioners
Defending individuals

DBMS successfully represents physicians and other healthcare professionals against negligence and other claims.

Healthcare Practitioners
  • James D. Sloan
  • Meagan P. VanderWeele
DBMS defends
Product Manufacturers
Illinois 2nd Dist. Appellate Court
Judgment for the Defense

DBMS secured a victory in which the Appellate Court affirmed summary judgment in a high-risk product liability case involving an industrial accident.

Plaintiff v. Defendant ManufacturerRead More
  • J. Kent Mathewson
  • Karen Kies DeGrand
  • Timothy L. Hogan
Illinois 14th Circuit
Verdict for the Defense

DBMS successfully defended a major auto manufacturer in a $6.6 million asbestos suit.

Plaintiffs v. Defendant Auto ManufacturerRead More
  • Mark H. Boyle
  • Edward E. Fu
Orleans Parish, Louisiana
Verdict for the defense

In a jurisdiction considered challenging, the jury found the automobile design was not unreasonably dangerous after DBMS showed alternative seat and restraint designs would have caused more injuries.

Bordelon v. Auto ManufacturerRead More
  • Mark H. Boyle
DBMS defends the
Legal Profession
Defending Attorneys
Verdict for the Defense

DBMS successfully defended a divorce lawyer accused of malpractice for not enjoining retirement savings accounts.

Plaintiff v. Defendant Divorce AttorneyRead More
  • John J. Duffy
  • Meagan P. VanderWeele
Defending Law Firms
Summary judgement for the defense

DBMS obtained summary judgement based on the statute of limitations in a case involving a law firm accused of malpractice.

Plaintiff v. Defendant Law FirmRead More
  • Michael J. Borree
  • Donald J. Brown, Jr.
  • Karen Kies DeGrand
Defending on Appeal
First District Affirmed Circuit Court’s Dismissal

DBMS achieved an appellate victory in a legal malpractice case involving the plaintiffs’ lawyer’s misconduct – including falsifying date stamps on court documents. 

Plaintiffs v. Defendant AttorneyRead More
  • John J. Duffy
  • Karen Kies DeGrand
  • Meagan P. VanderWeele
  • Laura C. Ieremia
DBMS defends
Clients on Appeal
Hospitals
Favorable Appellate Court Ruling

DBMS represented a hospital on a landmark appeal that will protect Illinois health care providers participating in voluntary reporting under the Patient Safety Act.

Daley v. TeruelRead More
  • Sherri M. Arrigo
  • Karen Kies DeGrand
  • Laura C. Ieremia
Medical Specialists
Favorable Illinois Appellate Court Ruling

DBMS successfully defended an orthopedic surgeon charged with medical negligence after the plaintiff claimed evidentiary error and speculative testimony in the first trial.

Sondergaard v. defendant physicianRead More
  • Karen Kies DeGrand
  • Amanda L. Balen
Medical Specialists
Favorable First District Ruling

DBMS successfully defended a specialist in a wrongful pregnancy claim in which the plaintiffs alleged the judgment was against the manifest weight of evidence or the product of evidentiary or instructional error.

Williams v. defendant physicianRead More
  • Richard H. Donohue
  • Karen Kies DeGrand
  • Meagan P. VanderWeele

Donohue Brown successfully litigates complex high-stakes cases. Our clients know our experience, skill and relationships will deliver optimal results for their trials in Chicago and beyond. LEARN MORE...

Donohue Brown Mathewson & Smyth LLC

Donohue Brown Mathewson & Smyth LLC is one of Chicago's pre-eminent trial practice firms. Founded in 1995, the firm successfully tries difficult, high exposure cases in the country's most challenging jurisdictions. The firm is known as one of the "go to" firms in Chicago for particularly difficult or high stakes cases and, since its founding, no firm in Chicago has tried as many complex cases as successfully as DBMS. Two partners have been ranked by Chicago Lawyer magazine as among the top 20 tort defense lawyers in Chicago and four partners have been elected as Fellows of The American College of Trial Lawyers.

Our Team